πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Honda HR-V vs Nissan Rogue

Two subcompact SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Honda HR-V β€” lower 5-year cost and better reliability.
Buy the Nissan Rogue if its specific features or size suit your needs better.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Honda HR-VNissan Rogue
Annual maintenance$301winner$467
5-year total cost$1,505winner$2,335
Reliability score10 / 10winner8 / 10
Major repair risk (5yr)5%winner12%
Cargo space55.1 cu ft74.1 cu ftwinner
Starting price (new)$28,600winner$30,800
Best years to buyβ€”β€”

Which is more reliable?

Honda HR-VNissan Rogue
RepairPal score10 / 10winner8 / 10
NHTSA complaints / 100k147.9winner156.8
Years to avoid2022, 20232017, 2018, 2019
Value retained Β· 3 yr87.1%winner71.7%
Value retained Β· 5 yr71.3%winner55.1%
Value retained Β· 7 yr60.5%winner45%

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Honda HR-VNissan Rogue
Engine4.6%winner16.2%
Electrical10.6%7.7%winner
ADAS8.5%winner16.2%
Brakes3.0%winner6.4%
Steering9.2%1.8%winner
Fuel system7.4%3.4%winner
Tires/Wheels0.6%winner1.0%
Glass/Windows29.2%4.0%winner
Airbags3.5%winner8.9%
Seatbelt0.9%winner1.3%

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Honda HR-VNissan Rogue
Avg annual premium$2,005$1,984winner

Common questions

The HR-V is one of the cheapest SUVs to own in any segment β€” averaging $301/year in maintenance, $165 below the subcompact average of $466. Its repair frequency of 10% is half the subcompact segment average of 20%, and its 5% major repair probability is well below the class norm of 9%. For pure ownership cost, nothing in the subcompact class touches it.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’