Honda CR-V vs Jeep Wrangler
Two compact SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.
// VERDICT
Our verdict
Buy the Honda CR-V β lower 5-year cost and better reliability.
Buy the Jeep Wrangler if its specific features or size suit your needs better.
// COST HEAD TO HEAD
Maintenance and ownership cost
| Honda CR-V | Jeep Wrangler | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual repairs | $407winner | $694 |
| 5-year repair cost | $2,035winner | $3,470 |
| Scheduled service (to 150k mi) | $9,882winner | $21,803 |
| Reliability score | 9 / 10winner | 7 / 10 |
| Major repair risk (5yr) | 9%winner | 16% |
| Cargo space | 76.5 cu ftwinner | 72.4 cu ft |
| Starting price (new) | $33,500winner | $35,600 |
// RELIABILITY
Which is more reliable?
| Honda CR-V | Jeep Wrangler | |
|---|---|---|
| RepairPal score | 9 / 10winner | 7 / 10 |
| NHTSA complaints / 100k | 191.2winner | 327.2 |
| Strongest years | 2010, 2011, 2012 | 2011, 2015, 2016 |
| Weakest years | 2016, 2017, 2018 | 2018, 2021, 2023 |
| Value retained Β· 3 yr | 86.7%winner | 75.1% |
| Value retained Β· 5 yr | 71.1%winner | 68% |
| Value retained Β· 7 yr | 58%winner | 56.7% |
// COMMON PROBLEMS
What breaks β and what it costs
| Honda CR-V | Jeep Wrangler | |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 22.9%winner | 23.5% |
| Electrical | 8.6%winner | 11.4% |
| ADAS | 16.8% | 4.7%winner |
| Brakes | 4.0%winner | 5.8% |
| Suspension | βwinner | 2.7% |
| Steering | 12.1%winner | 27.2% |
| Fuel system | 8.0% | 5.1%winner |
| Tires/Wheels | 2.0% | βwinner |
| Glass/Windows | 3.4% | 1.8%winner |
| Airbags | 8.0%winner | 8.2% |
One major repair on either model can run $1,500β4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.
// INSURANCE
Which is cheaper to insure?
| Honda CR-V | Jeep Wrangler | |
|---|---|---|
| Avg annual premium | $1,951winner | $1,984 |
// FULL MODEL PAGES
// FAQ
Common questions
The CR-V averages $407/year in maintenance costs β $114 below the compact segment average of $521. Its 9/10 reliability score and 9% major repair probability are both better than the class averages of 8 and 11% respectively. Repair frequency of 30% matches the segment average, but the combination of low cost per visit and a below-average major-repair risk makes it the strongest long-term ownership value in the compact class.
How we calculated this. Repair costs, reliability scores, and maintenance schedules from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA and fuel prices from the EIA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β