πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Chevrolet Blazer vs Kia Sportage

Two midsize SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Kia Sportage to minimise 5-year ownership cost.
Buy the Kia Sportage if long-term reliability matters most.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Chevrolet BlazerKia Sportage
Annual maintenance$521$462winner
5-year total cost$2,605$2,310winner
Reliability score8 / 108 / 10
Major repair risk (5yr)11%11%
Cargo spaceβ€”73.7 cu ft
Starting price (new)$37,095$30,900winner
Best years to buyβ€”β€”

Which is more reliable?

Chevrolet BlazerKia Sportage
RepairPal score8 / 108 / 10
NHTSA complaints / 100k135.2winner176.6
Years to avoid2019, 2020, 20212010, 2012, 2013
Value retained Β· 3 yr71.6%75.7%winner
Value retained Β· 5 yr52.8%56.8%winner
Value retained Β· 7 yr40.5%45%winner

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Chevrolet BlazerKia Sportage
Engine24.3%winner55.6%
Electrical15.8%6.1%winner
ADAS9.0%5.8%winner
Brakes6.7%winner8.5%
Suspension1.1%β€”winner
Steering7.7%1.5%winner
Fuel system2.3%1.1%winner
Tires/Wheels3.8%0.5%winner
Glass/Windows0.8%winner2.7%
Airbags1.5%winner2.5%
Lightingβ€”winner1.0%

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Chevrolet BlazerKia Sportage
Avg annual premium$2,570$1,997winner

Common questions

The Blazer costs $521/year to maintain β€” $52 below the midsize segment average of $573. Repair frequency of 28% is well below the class average of 40%, and major repair probability of 11% is well below the 13% norm. Combined with a reliability score of 8 above the class average of 7, it's one of the stronger ownership-cost profiles in the midsize segment.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’