πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Kia Sportage vs Toyota 4Runner

Two compact SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Kia Sportage to minimise 5-year ownership cost.
Buy the Toyota 4Runner if long-term reliability matters most.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Kia SportageToyota 4Runner
Annual maintenance$462winner$514
5-year total cost$2,310winner$2,570
Reliability score8 / 108 / 10
Major repair risk (5yr)11%winner13%
Cargo space73.7 cu ft90.2 cu ftwinner
Starting price (new)$30,900winner$43,500
Best years to buyβ€”2024

Which is more reliable?

Kia SportageToyota 4Runner
RepairPal score8 / 108 / 10
NHTSA complaints / 100k176.665.7winner
Years to avoid2010, 2012, 20132023, 2025
Value retained Β· 3 yr75.7%93.3%winner
Value retained Β· 5 yr56.8%74.6%winner
Value retained Β· 7 yr45%64%winner

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Kia SportageToyota 4Runner
Engine55.6%4.0%winner
Electrical6.1%winner6.4%
ADAS5.8%4.5%winner
Brakes8.5%winner8.7%
Suspensionβ€”winner3.1%
Steering1.5%winner7.4%
Fuel system1.1%winner4.8%
Tires/Wheels0.5%winner2.9%
Glass/Windows2.7%2.4%winner
Airbags2.5%winner36.2%
Lighting1.0%β€”winner

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Kia SportageToyota 4Runner
Avg annual premium$1,997winner$2,045

Common questions

The Sportage averages $462/year in maintenance β€” $59 below the compact segment average of $521. Repair frequency of 19% is well below the class average of 30% β€” owners visit for unscheduled repairs far less often than most rivals. Major repair probability of 11% is at the class average. Low cost and low visit frequency make it a strong ownership value.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’