πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Honda Passport vs Jeep Compass

Two midsize SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Honda Passport to minimise 5-year ownership cost.
Buy the Jeep Compass if long-term reliability matters most.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Honda PassportJeep Compass
Annual maintenance$521winner$526
5-year total cost$2,605winner$2,630
Reliability score8 / 108 / 10
Major repair risk (5yr)11%11%
Cargo spaceβ€”β€”
Starting price (new)$44,950$29,550winner
Best years to buyβ€”β€”

Which is more reliable?

Honda PassportJeep Compass
RepairPal score8 / 108 / 10
NHTSA complaints / 100k194.7182.8winner
Years to avoid2019, 2023, 20242019, 2022, 2025
Value retained Β· 3 yr75.8%winner68%
Value retained Β· 5 yr58.8%winner56.9%
Value retained Β· 7 yr49.3%50.4%winner

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Honda PassportJeep Compass
Engine14.8%winner26.2%
Electrical13.5%11.8%winner
ADAS26.9%12.8%winner
Brakes6.1%3.1%winner
Suspensionβ€”winner2.7%
Steering1.9%winner2.9%
Fuel system6.7%4.2%winner
Tires/Wheels3.6%1.4%winner
Glass/Windows2.9%β€”winner
Airbags1.9%winner11.7%
Lighting1.2%winner2.3%

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Honda PassportJeep Compass
Avg annual premium$2,489$2,011winner

Common questions

The Passport costs $521/year to maintain β€” $52 below the midsize segment average of $573. Repair frequency of 28% is well below the class average of 40%, and major repair probability of 11% is well below the 13% norm. Combined with a reliability score of 8 above the segment average of 7, the Passport is one of the better ownership-cost propositions in the midsize class.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’