πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Honda HR-V vs Subaru Crosstrek

Two subcompact SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Honda HR-V β€” lower 5-year cost and better reliability.
Buy the Subaru Crosstrek if its specific features or size suit your needs better.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Honda HR-VSubaru Crosstrek
Annual maintenance$301winner$492
5-year total cost$1,505winner$2,460
Reliability score10 / 10winner9 / 10
Major repair risk (5yr)5%winner7%
Cargo space55.1 cu ftwinner54.7 cu ft
Starting price (new)$28,600$27,600winner

Which is more reliable?

Honda HR-VSubaru Crosstrek
RepairPal score10 / 10winner9 / 10
NHTSA complaints / 100k151.765.9winner
Strongest years2017, 20212013
Weakest years2022, 20232016, 2018, 2019
Value retained Β· 3 yr87.1%90.5%winner
Value retained Β· 5 yr71.3%winner71.2%
Value retained Β· 7 yr60.5%winner59.5%

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Honda HR-VSubaru Crosstrek
Engine12.4%winner15.8%
Electrical11.7%11.5%winner
ADAS8.6%winner9.4%
Brakes3.9%2.2%winner
Steering7.7%3.6%winner
Fuel system6.3%β€”winner
Tires/Wheelsβ€”winner2.4%
Glass/Windows23.4%winner28.7%
Airbags4.0%1.8%winner
Lightingβ€”winner2.2%
Seatbelt0.8%β€”winner

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Honda HR-VSubaru Crosstrek
Avg annual premium$2,005$1,968winner

Common questions

The Honda HR-V averages $301 a year in maintenance. That is $165 below the subcompact segment average of $466. Owners bring it in for unscheduled repairs an average of 0.1 times per year, below the subcompact segment at 0.2. Its reliability score is 10/10. Verdict: cheaper than average to keep on the road.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’