πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Ford Explorer vs GMC Terrain

Two three-row SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Ford Explorer based on your priorities for this class.
Buy the GMC Terrain based on your priorities for this class.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Ford ExplorerGMC Terrain
Annual maintenance$732β€”
5-year total cost$3,660β€”
Reliability score7 / 10β€”
Major repair risk (5yr)14%β€”
Cargo space85.3 cu ftβ€”
Starting price (new)$41,300$32,200winner
Best years to buy2010, 2023, 20242023, 2025

Which is more reliable?

Ford ExplorerGMC Terrain
RepairPal score7 / 10β€”
NHTSA complaints / 100k452.2217.3winner
Years to avoid2011, 2013, 20142011, 2012, 2013
Value retained Β· 3 yr72.5%β€”
Value retained Β· 5 yr49.9%β€”
Value retained Β· 7 yr39.6%β€”

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Ford ExplorerGMC Terrain
Engine14.1%winner37.8%
Electrical4.1%winner6.0%
ADAS3.3%winner4.9%
Brakes1.7%winner5.7%
Suspension2.5%β€”winner
Steering22.1%1.8%winner
Fuel system2.8%winner3.7%
Tires/Wheels1.6%0.7%winner
Glass/Windows3.0%winner14.5%
Airbags2.6%winner5.6%
Lightingβ€”winner2.8%

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Ford ExplorerGMC Terrain
Avg annual premium$2,461β€”

Common questions

The Explorer costs $732/year to maintain β€” $159 above the three-row segment average of $573. Repair frequency of 24% is well below the class average of 40% β€” the lowest in the three-row segment. Reliability score of 7 matches the segment average, and major repair probability of 14% is slightly above the 13% norm. Well above-average cost, but notably fewer unscheduled shop visits than class rivals.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’