πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Chevrolet Equinox vs Mazda CX-90

Two compact SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Chevrolet Equinox based on your priorities for this class.
Buy the Mazda CX-90 based on your priorities for this class.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Chevrolet EquinoxMazda CX-90
Annual maintenance$537β€”
5-year total cost$2,685β€”
Reliability score7 / 10β€”
Major repair risk (5yr)18%β€”
Cargo space63.5 cu ftβ€”
Starting price (new)$31,000winner$39,300
Best years to buy2021, 2023, 2024β€”

Which is more reliable?

Chevrolet EquinoxMazda CX-90
RepairPal score7 / 10β€”
NHTSA complaints / 100k162.115winner
Years to avoid2010, 2011, 20132025
Value retained Β· 3 yr76.1%winner72.9%
Value retained Β· 5 yr54.3%56.9%winner
Value retained Β· 7 yr43.2%46.2%winner

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Chevrolet EquinoxMazda CX-90
Engine40.0%15.0%winner
Electrical5.9%winner10.0%
ADAS5.2%winner40.0%
Brakes4.9%winner10.0%
Steering2.5%β€”winner
Fuel system4.5%β€”winner
Tires/Wheels1.7%winner15.0%
Glass/Windows16.7%β€”winner
Airbags4.4%β€”winner
Seatbelt0.6%winner5.0%

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Chevrolet EquinoxMazda CX-90
Avg annual premium$2,140winner$2,255

Common questions

The Equinox costs around $537/year to maintain β€” $16 above the compact segment average of $521. Repair frequency of 31% is essentially at the class average of 30%, but its 18% major repair probability runs well above the segment average of 11%, meaning there's a meaningfully higher chance of facing a costly unscheduled repair in any given year than with class leaders like the CR-V or RAV4.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’